|
Students were invited to write a poem for the school literary magazine.
Circumstances of performance
This sample of student work was produced under the following
conditions: |
| alone |
in a group |
| in class |
as homework |
| with teacher feedback |
with peer feedback |
| timed |
opportunity for revision |
|
|
b
Literature: The student produces work in at least one literary genre that
follows the conventions of the genre.
| This poem incorporates many of the
elements that distinguish poetry from prose, such as precise word
choice, condensed form, and the use of sensory imagery, figurative
language, and white space. |
|
This
work sample illustrates a standard-setting performance for
the following part of the standards:
|
|
b |
Literature: Produce work
in at least one literary genre that follows the conventions
of the genre. |
|
This poem is an extended metaphor implicitly comparing Vivaldis
music with a raindrop. The poem demonstrates the students understanding
of the uses of figurative language and sensory imagery as conventions
of the genre. The brevity and original imagery are reminiscent of the
Japanese forms of haiku (seventeen syllables) and tanka (35 syllables).
The student used sensory images to appeal to the senses of:
hearing;
sight; and
touch.
The line breaks not only impart rhythm to the poem but also give the
poem a sense of movement, e.g., bigger and bigger.
The alliterative use of sibilants (e.g., splashes into thousands
of silver violins) acts as onomatopoeia reinforcing the musical
metaphor.
The students
use of personification gives the image of the rain drop falling to the
ground a graceful, poised air. Again, the choice of metaphor echoes the
musical theme.
|