|
The task
Students were asked to research, outline, and write a term paper on a
current, controversial topic. The assignment included the selection of
a topic of personal interest and the development of a thesis question.
Circumstances of performance
This sample of student work was produced under the following
conditions: |
| alone |
in a group |
| in class |
as homework |
| with teacher feedback |
with peer feedback |
| timed |
opportunity for revision |
|
|
What the work shows
c
Reading: The student reads and comprehends
informational materials to develop understanding and expertise
and produces written or oral work that: |
| |
restates or summarizes
information; |
| |
relates new information
to prior knowledge and experience; |
| |
extends ideas; |
| |
makes connections to
related topics or information. |
The student
read materials from a variety of sources in order to collect information
about the labels that are used to refer to people with disabilities.
This reference section includes materials from research studies, journals,
popular magazines, and books. |
|
The student summarized the information on the impact of labels and stereotyping
to support the discussion and conclusion of the paper.
The work demonstrates
that the student was able to extend the ideas presented in these materials
and form an opinion.
The work forges
connections between more general studies of language and uses them to
support the opinion that the way language is used to describe people is
important to their self-respect.
e
Writing: The student produces a persuasive
essay that: |
| |
engages the reader by
establishing a context, creating a persona, and otherwise developing
reader interest; |
| |
develops a controlling
idea that makes a clear and knowledgeable judgment; |
| |
creates an organizing
structure that is appropriate to the needs, values, and interests
of a specified audience, and arranges details, reasons, examples,
and anecdotes effectively and persuasively; |
| |
includes appropriate
information and arguments and excludes information and arguments
that are irrelevant; |
| |
anticipates and addresses
reader concerns and counter-arguments; |
| |
supports arguments with
detailed evidence, citing sources of information as appropriate; |
| |
provides a sense of
closure to the writing. |
|
|
|
|
The student created a structure by organizing the material
around the arguments for and against the theory that labels affect
the status and behavior of people with disabilities. The work develops
a sophisticated view that goes beyond the popularly held notion of
the benefits of politically correct language by incorporating published
research.
The student
presented counter-arguments by incorporating an alternative view from
a respected disabled person who believes that politically correct
language is used for the benefit of the general population and not
to aid people with disabilities.
The students
arguments are based on appropriate research and present both sides
of the controversy as is documented by the bibliography. This is also
evidenced in the footnotes.
|
|
The student provided a strong sense of closure by establishing the
importance of seeing disabled people as people regardless of the labels
used to describe them. |
a
Conventions, Grammar, and Usage
of the English Language: The student demonstrates an understanding
of the rules of the English language in written and oral work,
and selects the structures and features of language appropriate
to the purpose, audience, and context of the work. The student
demonstrates control of: |
| |
grammar; |
| |
paragraph structure; |
| |
punctuation; |
| |
sentence construction; |
| |
spelling; |
| |
usage. |
|
In almost error free writing, the student demonstrated an understanding
of the rules of the English language.
The student incorporated a number of techniques used in academic
writing, such as footnotes and a reference section. Each of the
quotations used are contextualized and referenced. This gives the
report a professional look and gives the students arguments
much more credibility. The student does not, however, do the more
extensive processing of information that would be expected at the
high school level.
There is an error in the Sources Consulted section
(socil instead of social). This appears
to be a typographical error since the student spelled this word
correctly elsewhere.
|
|