| The Story Behind
the ElectroHawk 1 Project
Students were asked to devise a project that would develop their
skills in gathering and using information, communication, and
problem solving, and help them to become self-directed learners.
They had wide latitude in choosing the focus for their projects.
This student decided to design and build an electric car for entry
in a local competition.
The students were expected to develop a proposal for their project,
maintain a journal of the work they did, make a presentation of
their finished work to an audience made up of people from the
school and the community, and write a reflection on what they
learned through the project. The students were also expected to
find a mentor with expertise appropriate to their project focus
to assist them through the process. The project was expected to
take up some time in school but to also involve extensive work
outside school time. A teacher took on the role of advising the
students throughout the process of developing their proposals
and planning their presentations.
This student formed a team of students to work on the project.
They worked intensively on the project over a period of two months
under deadlines established by the dates for the three rounds
of racing competition.
The written work produced as part of Applied Learning projects
commonly contains some errors. Documentation of these projects
includes notes, journal entries and plans that students produced
as working documents for their personal use. These kinds of documents
were not prepared with the expectation of eventual publication
and they have not been revised for inclusion in this book.
It is expected that finished work produced as part of an Applied
Learning project will contain virtually error free writing.
What the work shows
a
Problem Solving: The student designs and creates a product,
service, or system to meet an identified need; that is, the student:
| |
develops a design proposal that: |
| |
|
shows how the ideas for the design were developed; |
| |
|
reflects awareness of similar work done by others
and of relevant design standards and regulations; |
| |
|
justifies the choices made in finalizing the design
with reference, for example, to functional, aesthetic, social,
economic, and environmental considerations; |
| |
|
establishes criteria for evaluating the product,
service, or system; |
| |
|
uses appropriate conventions to represent the
design; |
| |
plans and implements the steps needed to create
the product, service, or system; |
| |
makes adjustments as needed to conform with specified
standards or regulations regarding quality or safety; |
| |
evaluates the product, service, or system in terms
of the criteria established in the design proposal, and with
reference to: |
| |
|
information gathered from sources such as impact
studies, product testing, or market research; |
| |
|
comparisons with similar work done by others. |
|



|
The proposal explains
the genesis of the project: the P.U.D. (Public Utilities Department)
provided the school with an electric motor, a speed control, and
two batteries as the basis for designing and building an electric
or solar-electric vehicle for entry in a competition with other
schools in the local area.
The proposal records the plan the student envisaged early in the
process. This plan is reflected in the timeline. The journal provides
insight into the reality of the design process, especially the
ways in which the students responded to problems they encountered
as the design took shape.
The students began by building a wooden mock up for the vehicle
(not shown).
The proposal provides a record of some of the design issues that
the student envisaged would require resolution. These are reflected
in the Time Line. The proposal also established criteria
for evaluating the design: a solid, well built, highly efficient
electric vehicle.
Apart from reference to the mock up (which is one of the ways
of presenting a design for a product of this sort), there is no
reference to the presentation of design plans.
The proposal notes some of the skills the student identified that
he would need to learn in order to complete the project.
The students devoted a lot of time and energy to testing their
design and to trying out strategies to improve its performance
and efficiency. The strategies included analysis of records of
performance.
a
Learning and Self-management Tools and Techniques: The student
learns from models; that is, the student:
| |
consults with and observes other students and
adults at work and analyzes their roles to determine the critical
demands, such as demands for knowledge and skills, judgment
and decision making; |
| |
identifies models for the results of project
work, such as professionally produced publications, and analyzes
their qualities; |
| |
uses what he or she learns from models in planning
and conducting project activities. |
The proposal records
the difficulties the students experienced in identifying a mentor,
though they eventually succeeded in finding a person who had taken
part in a similar project.
The team also made extensive use of the assistance of teachers
with knowledge and expertise in areas such as welding. The students
recognition of the importance of these models to the eventual
result is evident throughout his journal.
a
Tools and Techniques for Working With Others: The student participates
in the establishment and operation of self-directed work teams;
that is, the student:
| |
defines roles and shares responsibilities among
team members; |
| |
sets objectives and time frames for the work
to be completed; |
| |
establishes processes for group decision making; |
| |
reviews progress and makes adjustments as required. |
The student makes
several references to the importance of teamwork in arriving at
the goal of winning the competition. He notes also the connection
between a strong team and the quality of the vehicle, and the
connection between quality and safety.
The proposal also establishes the outcomes for the work to be
completed.
|
|
a
Problem Solving: The student designs and creates a product, service,
or system to meet an identified need; that is, the student:
| |
develops a design proposal that: |
| |
|
shows how the ideas for the design were developed; |
| |
|
reflects awareness of similar work done by others
and of relevant design standards and regulations; |
| |
|
justifies the choices made in finalizing the design
with reference, for example, to functional, aesthetic, social,
economic, and environmental considerations; |
| |
|
establishes criteria for evaluating the product,
service, or system; |
| |
|
uses appropriate conventions to represent the
design; |
| |
plans and implements the steps needed to create
the product, service, or system; |
| |
makes adjustments as needed to conform with specified
standards or regulations regarding quality or safety; |
| |
evaluates the product, service, or system in terms
of the criteria established in the design proposal, and with
reference to: |
| |
|
information gathered from sources such as impact
studies, product testing, or market research; |
| |
|
comparisons with similar work done by others. |
|
|
|
The timeline records the planned steps for turning the design into
a reality while the journal entries record the ways in which those
steps were achieved in practice and the modifications to the process
the students made along the way.
b
Learning and Self-management Tools and Techniques: The student
reviews his or her own progress in completing work activities and
adjusts priorities as needed to meet deadlines; that is, the student:
| |
develops and maintains work schedules that reflect
consideration of priorities; |
| |
manages time; |
| |
monitors progress towards meeting deadlines and
adjusts priorities as necessary. |
The work schedule
was established in the timeline.
|
|
|
a
Tools and Techniques for Working With Others:
The student participates in the establishment and operation of
self-directed work teams; that is, the student:
| |
defines roles and shares responsibilities among
team members; |
| |
sets objectives and time frames for the work
to be completed; |
| |
establishes processes for group decision making; |
| |
reviews progress and makes adjustments as required. |
The proposal and timeline establish the objectives and time frame
and the journal provides evidence that the team reviewed their
progress and made adjustments as required.
|
|
a
Problem Solving: The student designs and creates a product, service,
or system to meet an identified need; that is, the student:
| |
develops a design proposal that: |
| |
|
shows how the ideas for the design were developed; |
| |
|
reflects awareness of similar work done by others
and of relevant design standards and regulations; |
| |
|
justifies the choices made in finalizing the design
with reference, for example, to functional, aesthetic, social,
economic, and environmental considerations; |
| |
|
establishes criteria for evaluating the product,
service, or system; |
| |
|
uses appropriate conventions to represent the
design; |
| |
plans and implements the steps needed to create
the product, service, or system; |
| |
makes adjustments as needed to conform with specified
standards or regulations regarding quality or safety; |
| |
evaluates the product, service, or system in terms
of the criteria established in the design proposal, and with
reference to: |
| |
|
information gathered from sources such as impact
studies, product testing, or market research; |
| |
|
comparisons with similar work done by others.
|
The journal records
some of the problems the students encountered and the strategies
they adopted to solve them.
The design solutions reached during the course of construction of
the vehicle are justified in terms of functional considerations.
The students were very aware of comparisons with other vehicles
built for the competition. Even the use of XXX in the
journal indicates an awareness that other electric car developers
could gain advantages from the information the students gathered
in their tests.
The journal was produced for the purposes of record keeping and
reflection. It was not revised for publication.
The proposal and journal contain several references that demonstrate
attention to relevant regulations and to safety-related considerations.
|
|
b
Learning and Self-management Tools and Techniques: The student
reviews his or her own progress in completing work activities and
adjusts priorities as needed to meet deadlines; that is, the student:
| |
develops and maintains work schedules that reflect
consideration of priorities; |
| |
manages time; |
| |
monitors progress towards meeting deadlines and
adjusts priorities as necessary. |
The journal records
several instances in which the students found it necessary to adjust
their priorities in order to deal with unforeseen problems and to
meet deadlines.
|
|
 |
a
Tools and Techniques for Working With Others:
The student participates in the establishment and operation of
self-directed work teams; that is, the student:
| |
defines roles and shares responsibilities among
team members; |
| |
sets objectives and time frames for the work
to be completed; |
| |
establishes processes for group decision making; |
| |
reviews progress and makes adjustments as required. |
It is clear from
the journal entries that the work was a team effort, though there
are few references to the definition of roles and responsibilities
or of the processes the team established for decision making.
The journal also makes it clear that the students took responsibility
for the project despite the close involvement and assistance of
their advisors.
c
Learning and Self-management Tools and Techniques: The student
evaluates his or her performance; that is, the student:
| |
establishes expectations for his or her own
achievement; |
| |
critiques his or her work in light of the established
expectations; |
| |
seeks and responds to advice and criticism from
others. |

The proposal and journal reflect the students expectations
for his own achievement. The journal also records the students
analysis of his work in light of those expectations. The entries
focus on the efforts he and his fellow team members made to reach
a satisfactory result, rather than a detailed analysis of the students
own performance. There is also evidence of seeking and responding
to advice, especially from the teachers who provided assistance
to the team.
|

The students recognition of his accomplishment is evident
throughout the written work, as is his pride which comes through
in a humble voice.
|
a
Information Tools and Techniques: The student gathers information
to assist in completing project work; that is, the student:
| |
identifies potential sources of information to
assist in completing the project; |
| |
uses appropriate techniques to collect the information,
e.g., considers sampling issues in conducting a survey; |
| |
interprets and analyzes the information; |
| |
evaluates the information in terms of completeness,
relevance, and validity; |
| |
shows evidence of research in the completed project. |
The student collected data on various aspects of the performance
of the electric car on test laps and produced graphs of the data
as a tool to assist in its interpretation. He discusses the value
of this research in completing the project in his journal.
|
 |
 |
e
Information Tools and Techniques: The student creates, edits,
and analyzes a spreadsheet of information that displays data in
tabular, numeric format and includes multiple graphs; that is, the
student:
| |
creates a spreadsheet that displays the use of
formulas and functions; |
| |
uses features of the software to sort, arrange,
display, and extract data for specific purposes; |
| |
uses features of the software to create multiple
spreadsheets and to synthesize the spreadsheets into a single
presentation. |
The student used a spreadsheet program to assist in the analysis
of the data he collected on the performance of the electric car.
|
Back
to Index
|