The task
In a seed germination and plant growth experiment, students were required to keep all conditions equal except for a single variable, the volume of water. Each student team was required to monitor growth of four sets of seeds; each set included seeds of four different plant species. The four seed sets were grown in four cups, with each cup receiving a different volume of water. Over the course of the investigation, students observed the cups at regular intervals to determine the most favorable water quantity (of the quantities used) for seed germination and growth.

Circumstances of performance
This sample of student work was produced under the following conditions:
alone in a group
in class as homework
with teacher feedback with peer feedback
timed opportunity for revision

This work sample illustrates a standard-setting performance for the following parts of the standards:
a Life Sciences Concepts: Survival and environmental support.
a Scientific Connections and Applications: Big ideas and unifying concepts.
f Scientific Thinking: Work individually and in teams.
a Scientific Tools and Technologies: Use tools to gather data.
a Scientific Communication: Represent data and results in multiple ways.



What the work shows
a Life Sciences Concepts:
The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of characteristics of organisms, such as survival and environmental support….
Throughout the observations and especially in the conclusion, the student demonstrates understanding of the impacts of different volumes of water on seed germination and plant growth.

a Scientific Connections and Applications: The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of big ideas and unifying concepts, such as…cause and effect.
The conclusion states, “By observing the four cups over three weeks, we saw that the plants that were watered 40 ml 2 x a week grew best…” In comparison, the student goes on to explicitly describe the relationship between too much water and lack of germination in the 80ml cup. While use of the word “drowned” is technically incorrect, it doesn’t detract from the student’s understanding that a causal relationship exists.

f Scientific Thinking: The student works individually and in teams to collect and share information and ideas.
The student places individual work within the context of the team assignment: “I am planting corn in each cup. The other students are planting pea, radish and barley.” (In a revision, it would be appropriate to have the student go on to explain that data were collected individually and analyzed cooperatively to reach the conclusion.)

a Scientific Tools and Technologies: The student uses…tools…to gather data.
The “Environment” columns in the “Data Table” imply evidence of the use of graduated cylinders for measuring volume.
The “Height…” columns in the Data Table provide evidence of the use of rulers.

a Scientific Communication: The student represents data and results in multiple ways, such as numbers, tables… drawings…and technical and creative writing.
The written conclusion presents the outcome and data analysis clearly, concisely.
The two tables (“Plant Observations” and “Plant Profile”) required students to organize and present their data in graphic formats that encompass numbers, tables, drawings, and written statements.