The task
The task was an investigation in which students analyzed an archeological artifact—a pendulum—discovered by the fictional Morgan International Research Institute during an expedition in Mali, West Africa. The students were asked to decide what function the artifact might have served, and to investigate the variables that affect the period of a pendulum’s oscillation.

Circumstances of performance
This sample of student work was produced under the following conditions:
alone in a group
in class as homework
with teacher feedback with peer feedback
timed opportunity for revision

These work samples illustrate standard-setting performances for the following parts of the standards:
d Physical Sciences Concepts: Motions and forces.
e Scientific Connections and Applications: Impact of science.
a Scientific Thinking: Frame questions to distinguish cause and effect.
b Scientific Thinking: Use concepts from Science Standards 1 to 4.
e Scientific Thinking: Identify problems.
f Scientific Thinking: Work individually and in teams.
a Scientific Tools and Technologies: Use technology and tools.
a Scientific Communication: Represent data and results in multiple ways.
b Scientific Communication: Argue from evidence.
e Scientific Communication: Communicate in a form suited to the purpose and the audience.
a Scientific Investigation: Demonstrate scientific competence by completing a controlled experiment.



What the work shows

d Physical Sciences Concepts: The student provides evidence that demonstrates understanding of motions and forces, such as gravitational….
The student correctly states that the pendulum’s motion is due to the influence of gravity, and notes differences in gravity related to geographical location.
The hypothesis and the narrative comparison of the data tables demonstrate understanding of concepts related to motion and force.

e Scientific Connections and Applications: The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of the impact of science, such as historical and contemporary contributions….
The student incorporates into the report several references to Galileo’s work with pendulums.

a Scientific Thinking: The student frames questions to distinguish cause and effect; and identifies or controls variables in experimental and non-experimental research settings.
The student frames the question appropriately.
The student identified and controlled each variable in designing her experiment, and in recording data in the tables and graphs.
The “Explanation,” clearly demonstrates the student’s understanding of variables. This section of the report describes the efforts made to control variables and the limitations of those efforts.

b Scientific Thinking: The student uses concepts from Science Standards 1 to 4 to explain a variety of observations and phenomena.
Throughout the “Interpretations” section and in the conclusion, the student applies concepts related to Science Standard d.

Scientific Thinking: The student identifies problems; proposes and implements solutions; and evaluates the accuracy, design, and outcomes of investigations.
In the “Explanation” the student identifies limitations of the procedure and comments on the resulting level of accuracy of the data collected.

f Scientific Thinking: The student works individually and in teams to collect and share information and ideas.
Both students mention working with team members. (The reports, however, are individual efforts.)

a Scientific Tools and Technologies: The student uses technology and tools (such as traditional laboratory equipment, video, and computer aids) to observe and measure objects, organisms, and phenomena, directly, indirectly, and remotely, with appropriate consideration of accuracy and precision.
The materials lists, responses to the investigation questions, and procedure section make it clear that scientific tools were used during the investigation.
The data in the tables and graphs demonstrate that the student repeated experiments to achieve an appropriate degree of precision.
The student comments on the accuracy and precision of the procedure and data.

a Scientific Communication: The student represents data and results in multiple ways, such as numbers, tables, and graphs; diagrams; technical and creative writing; and selects the most effective way to convey the scientific information.
The student’s narrative writing is clear and concise.
Throughout the report, the narrative text adds to the flow of information. This is especially true at points such as and , where the narrative is entirely original. The student also successfully incorporates book research into the report, as at .
The student uses tables and graphs to collect and represent the data. Each data table and graph deals with changes in one variable.
The student presents data from experiment 1 in three tables. However, data for only one manipulated variable should be presented in each table. It should also be pointed out that the student’s use of the term ‘fixed’ when referring to variables being ‘manipulated’ is incorrect.
The student uses a diagram to clarify his written description.
The student represents data and results in graphs. Again, the student attempts to incorporate too much information in one graph.

b Scientific Communication: The student argues from evidence, such as data produced through his or her own experimentation or data produced by others.
In the “Conclusions” section, the student argues from the experimental data that “…the most influential variable is the string length.”
The student uses graphic representations of the data to argue that the largest changes in the pendulum’s period of time occurred when the string length was changed.
Based on the graphed data, the student concludes that the largest change in the pendulum's period of time occurred when the length of the pendulum changed.

e Scientific Communication: The student communicates in a form suited to the purpose and the audience, such as by writing instructions that others can follow [and] critiquing written and oral explanations….
The student determines which variable contributed most in determining a pendulum’s period, and clearly communicates the results in written form.
The student provides a clearly written procedure for others to follow in repeating the experiment, and notes limitations of the procedure.

a Scientific Investigation: The student demonstrates scientific competence by completing a controlled experiment.
The tables and graphs showed that the student performed a series of steps that tested for specific variables. However, data for only one variable should be presented in each table and graph.
The student uses data from the investigation to reach a correct conclusion.
The student clearly outlines the experiment and states how each variable can be evaluated in a controlled way.

Student 1


Student 1

Student 1

Student 1


Student 1

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2

Student 2