The task
Students in a high school environmental science class were asked to compare an unbuffered solution with a buffered solution by using the technique of titration. This assignment was one of the lab activities in a unit on acid rain.

Circumstances of performance
This sample of student work was produced under the following conditions:
alone in a group
in class as homework
with teacher feedback with peer feedback
timed opportunity for revision

This work sample illustrates a standard-setting performance for the following parts of the standards:
c Physical Sciences Concepts: Chemical reactions.
a Scientific Connections and Applications: Big ideas and unifying concepts.
b Scientific Connections and Applications: The designed world.
a Scientific Thinking: Frame questions to distinguish cause and effect; identify or control variables in experimental or non-experimental research settings.
b Scientific Thinking: Use concepts from Science Standards 1–4.
a Scientific Tools and Technologies: Use technologies and tools.
a Scientific Communication: Represent data and results in multiple ways.
b Scientific Communication: Use facts to support conclusions.


What the work shows

c Physical Sciences Concepts: The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of chemical reactions, such as everyday examples of chemical reactions.
The student expresses understanding of the nature of chemical reactions in the concise explanations of the effects of buffers on [hydrogen] ion concentration.
The student’s explanation of why calcium carbonate is not a good buffer demonstrates an understanding of the role of ionic dissociation in a subsequent chemical reaction.

a Scientific Connections and Applications: The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of big ideas and unifying concepts, such as…cause and effect.
The student explicitly states that increasing the proportion of Na2HPO4 (sodium hydrogen phosphate) in relation to the acid will result in the release of more ions.

Throughout the answer to question 1 and especially at , the student expresses the results of the investigation as causal relationships.
In the answer to question 2, the student clearly states the chemical cause behind the sudden change in the pH data.

b Scientific Connections and Applications: The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of the designed world, such as the reasonableness of technological designs.
Throughout the answer to question 6, the student logically and correctly identifies scientific limitations to the use of lime in neutralizing an acidic lake. The student’s statements are actually conclusions based on the outcome of the investigation.
At the end of the answer to question 6, the student describes a fundamental societal limitation—economic—on large-scale use of lime to neutralize an acidic lake.

a Scientific Thinking: The student…identifies variables in experimental and non-experimental research settings.
The student correctly identifies the proportion of Na2HPO4 as the variable that determines its capacity to absorb acid.
The student correctly identifies the addition of lime as a variable that will increase pH, and states that the addition of other acids—another variable—will lower the pH.
The student notes the simultaneous effects of two variables in this statement.

b Scientific Thinking: The student uses concepts from Science Standards 1 to 4 to explain a variety of observations and phenomena.
The student uses understanding of c, specifically ionization and buffering, to explain the phenomena observed.
The student applies understanding of c to a new situation in the suggestion that biological (“organic”) inhabitants of a lake may excrete basic substances, and that introduction of such species into a damaged lake might provide natural buffering.

a Scientific Tools and Technologies: The student uses technology and tools…to observe and measure…with appropriate consideration of accuracy and precision.

The student’s collection of data demonstrates competence in using lab equipment (pH meter and equipment for titration) and the ability to observe and accurately measure phenomena. The student demonstrated appropriate consideration of accuracy and precision by recording consistent significant figures.

a Scientific Communication: The student represents data in multiple ways, such as tables and graphs…and selects the most effective way to convey the scientific information.
The student’s data are expressed in both table and graph forms. The graph organizes data from the table so that a viewer can instantly compare the buffering abilities of sodium phosphate and water.

b Scientific Tools and Technologies: The student uses technology and tools…to observe and measure…with appropriate consideration of accuracy and precision.
The answer to question #3 indicates the student’s ability to argue from evidence. The decision that water is not a good buffer is based on data produced through experimentation.

Spelling errors present in this work do not detract from the quality of the science.

Following are the lab questions answered by the student:
  1. Examine your graph for the titration of sodium phosphate. Explain the shape of the three parts of the curve.
  2. Explain why below pH 6 the curve drops off sharply.
  3. Compare the titration curves obtained for water and for sodium phosphate. Explain the difference.
  4. How could we increase the capacity of our sodium phosphate solution to absorb acid?
  5. Calcium carbonate is not particularly soluble in water (very little of it will dissolve in water). What problem does this present.
  6. “Lime” is actually calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2]. Why is trying to neutralize an acidic lake using lime not a good idea?
  7. Give a better strategy for neutralizing the waters of an acidic lake.
  8. Predict the contents of commercial preparations used to increase the pH of fish tanks. Why is the method of increasing pH in the fish tank critical?