The task
Sample 1 was an entry in a Golden State Examination Science Portfolio for the category “problem solving investigation.” Students were required to submit a piece of work and the “Self-Reflection Sheet.” In this case, the student designed and conducted an investigation to determine the density of sand. Sample 2 was done in class as a regular lab.

Circumstances of performance
This sample of student work was produced under the following conditions:
alone in a group
in class as homework
with teacher feedback with peer feedback
timed opportunity for revision

The work was done with a partner and written up individually.

This work sample illustrates a standard-setting performance for the following parts of the standards:
b Physical Sciences Concepts: Structure and properties of matter.
a Scientific Thinking: Frame questions to distinguish cause and effect; and identify or control variables.
e Scientific Thinking: Evaluate the accuracy, design, and outcomes of investigations.
f Scientific Thinking: Work individually and in teams.
a Scientific Tools and Technologies: Use technology and tools.
e Scientific Communication: Write instructions that others can follow.

Sample 1


Sample 1

What the work shows
b Physical Sciences Concepts: The student produces evidence that demonstrates understanding of the structure and properties of matter….
Throughout the work, the student explained the relationship between mass, volume, and density, often with a level of detail revealing excellent conceptual understanding. There is also ample evidence that the student appreciated the relevance of density in everyday situations.
a Scientific Thinking: The student frames questions to distinguish cause and effect; and identifies or controls variables in experimental and non-experimental research settings.
Here and throughout, the work displays evidence of appropriate scientific thinking and use of experimental data to reach conclusions.

e Scientific Thinking: The student identifies problems; proposes and implements solutions; and evaluates the accuracy, design, and outcomes of investigations.
The student continually evaluated and critiqued the appropriateness of the experimental design and the accuracy of the measuring process, and described the situations in which the techniques employed would be most effective.

f Scientific Thinking: The student works individually and in teams to collect and share information.
Comparison of results among groups provided partial confirmation of results.
The student has acknowledged the benefits of collaboration.

a Scientific Tools and Technologies: The student uses technology and tools (such as traditional laboratory equipment…) to…measure objects directly, indirectly…, and with appropriate consideration of accuracy and precision.
The student used traditional methods.
Comparison of results among groups was an effective method for judging accuracy.

e Scientific Communication: The student communicates in a form suited to the purpose and the audience, such as by writing instructions that others can follow….

Sample 1

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 2

Sample 2

Sample 2

Sample 2